Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrologic regime and macrophyte assemblages in temporary floodplain wetlands: Implications for detecting responses to environmental water allocations

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes the macrophyte assemblages of temporary floodplain wetlands situated on the floodplain of the Murray River, southeast Australia. Wetlands in the study are subject to flooding, the frequency, duration, and magnitude of which are dictated by the current, regulated river-flow regime. Our aim was to examine the influence of the existing flooding regime on macrophyte assemblages and to trial a monitoring program, based on a multiple before-after-control-impact (MBACI) design, to detect the impact of proposed environmental water allocations (EWAs) on the wetlands. Two categories of flooding regime were identified based on the flow magnitudes required for flooding to occur (flooding thresholds). In this scheme, wetlands with relatively low flooding thresholds are classed as ‘impact’ and those with higher thresholds are classed as ‘control.’ The wetlands were surveyed over a two-year period that incorporated at least one wetting-drying cycle at all wetlands. Results showed significant differences between survey times (season and year), but differences between flooding regime categories were significant only for some components of macrophyte assemblages. Differences between survey dates appear to reflect largely short-term responses to the most recent flood events. However, macrophyte differences observed between control and impact wetlands reflected the cumulative effect of flood events over several years. Differences between control and impact wetlands were strongest for post-flooding surveys based on full assemblages (using ANOSIM) and among specific taxa and functional groups (using ANOVA). Power to detect differences between control and impact wetlands was greatest for species richness and total abundance, but taxa with low variability among wetlands, and hence good power, were actually less sensitive to hydrologic change. We conclude that the MBACI design used in this study will be most effective in detecting wetland ecosystem responses to the implementation of EWAs if response variables are carefully chosen based on their sensitivity to hydrologic change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abernethy, V. J. and N. J. Willby. 1999. Changes along a disturbance gradient in the density and composition of propagule banks in floodplain aquatic habitats. Plant Ecology 140:177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barko, J. W, D. D. Gunnison, and S. R. Carpenter. 1991. Sediment interactions with submersed macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquatic Botany 41:41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanch, S. J., G. G. Ganf, and K. F. Walker. 1999. Tolerance of riverine plants to flooding and exposure indicated by water regime. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 15:43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonis, A., J. Lepart, and P. Grillas. 1995. Seed bank dynamics and coexistence of annual macrophytes in a temporary and variable habitat Oikos 74:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G. and C. Amoros. 1996. Disturbance regimes and vegetation dynamics: Role of floods in riverine wetlands. Journal of Vegetation Science 7:615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., C. Amoros, H. Piegay, J. Tachet, and T. Hein. 1998. Ecological complexity of wetlands within a river landscape. Biological Conservation 85:35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bren, L. J. 1992. Tree invasion of an intermittent wetland in relation to changes in the flooding frequency of the River Murray, Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 17:395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M. A. and M. T. Casanova. 1997. Plant life at the edge of wetlands: ecological responses to wetting and drying patterns. p 181–192. In N. Klomp and I. Lunt (eds.) Land and Water: Links and Barriers. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M. A. and K. H. Rogers. 1998. The regeneration potential of the seed bank of an ephemeral floodplain in South Africa. Aquatic Botany 61:123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, S. E., P. I. Boon, M. A. Brock, and N. J. Schofield. 1997. National wetlands R & D program scoping review. Land & Water Resources Research & Development Corporation, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Occasional Paper 01/97.

  • Burns, A. and K. F. Walker. 2000. Effects of water level regulation on algal biofilms in the River Murray, South Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 16:433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. J. 1999. Assessing biodiversity in temporary and permanent wetlands. p. 50–53. In W. L. Ponder and D. Lunney (eds.) The Other 99%. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterfield, E. A. 1986. Changes in the vegetation of the river red gum forest at Barmah, Victoria. Australian Forestry 49:16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. and R. M. Warwick. 1994. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. National Environment Research Council, Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, B. J., L. A. Barmuta, P. G. Fairweather, D. P. Faith, M. J. Keough, P. S. Lake, B. D. Mapstone, and G. P. Quinn. 2002. Monitoring Ecological Impacts: concepts and practice in flowing waters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M. and C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greulich, S., G. Bornette, C. Amoros, and J. G. M. Roelofs. 2000. Investigation on the fundamental niche of a rare species an experiment on establishment of Luronium natans. Aquatic Botany 66:209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, T. J. 1998. Billabongs: management issues for floodplain wetlands. p. 41–47. In W. D. Williams (ed.) Wetlands in a Dry Land: Understanding for Management. Environment Australia, Biodiversity Group, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, P and P. S. Lake. 2000. Fish Larvae and the management of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 16:421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley, and R. E. Sparks. 1989. The Flood Pulse Concept in River-Floodplain Systems. p. 110-127. In D. P. Dodge (ed.) Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Canadian Special Publications in Fisheries and Aquatic Science 106.

  • Keough, M. J. and B. D. Mapstone. 1995. Protocols for Designing Marine Ecological Monitoring Programs Associated with BEK Mills. CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

  • King, A. J., A. I. Robertson, and M. R. Healey. 1997. Experimental manipulations of the biomass of introduced carp (Cyprinus carpio) in billabongs. I. Impacts on water-column properties. Marine and Freshwater Research 48:435–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford, R. T. and R. F. Thomas. 1995. The Macquarie Marshes in arid Australia and their waterbirds: a 50-year history of decline. Environmental Management 19:867–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. J. 2001. Effect of river management on colonially-nesting waterbirds in the Barmah-Millewa Forest, south-eastern Australia. Regulated River: Research & Management 17:21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. and A. Lugg. 1994. Proposed plan for the rehabilitation of the Moira Lake Wetlands. NSW Murray Wetlands Working Group, Deniliquin, NSW, Australia.

  • Maheshwari, B. L., K. F. Walker, and T. A. McMahon. 1995. Effects of regulation on the flow regime of the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 10:15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauchamp, A., S. Blanch, and P. Grillas. 2001. Effects of submergence on the growth of Phragmites australis seedings. Aquatic Botany 69:147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MWEC. 1997. Sharing the Murray. Murray Water Entitlement Committee, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, J. M. and G. G. Ganf. 2000. Water regimes, seedling recruitment and establishment in three wetland plant species. Marine & Freshwater Research 51:305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, D. L. and A. J. Chick. 1997. Flood-mediated changes in aquatic macrophyte community structure. Marine & Freshwater Research 48:153–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. H. and M. C. Thoms. 1999. What is river health? Freshwater Biology 41:197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pautou, G. and M. F. Arens. 1994. Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: floodplain vegetation in the Upper Rhone River. Freshwater Biology 31:507–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E. 1984. Impounded Rivers. Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E. 1996. Water allocation to protect river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12:353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G. P. and M. J. Keough. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D. and H. E. Richter. 2000. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology 14:1467–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. I. 1998. The effect of livestock on wetlands. p. 195–201. In W. D. Williams (ed.) Wetlands in a Dry Land: Understanding for Management, Environment Australia, Biodiversity Group, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. I., P. Bacon, and G. Heagney. 2001. The responses of floodplain primary production to flood frequency and timing. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, M. C. and F. Sheldon. 2000. Lowland rivers: an Australian introduction. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 16:375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Brink, F. W. B., G. Van Der Velde, W. W. Bosman, and H. Coops. 1995. Effects of substrate parameters on growth responses of eight helophyte species in relation to flooding. Aquatic Botany 50:79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. F. and M. C. Thoms. 1993. Environmental effects of flow regulation on the lower River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 8:103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. and J. A. Stanford. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: Extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 3–4:159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., K. Tockner, and F. Schiemer. 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 15:125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. A. 1991. Investigation of the flood requirements of the Moira Grass plains in Barmah Forest Victoria. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Shepparton, Vic, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. A., C. Leitch, L. N. Lloyd, and B. P. Atkins. 1994. Interim Water Management Strategy for Barmah Forest, Victoria. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Shepparton, Vic, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. D., D. R. J. Moore, and P. A. Keddy. 1993. Relationships of Marsh Seed Banks to Vegetation Patterns Along Environmental Gradients. Freshwater Biology 29:361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences and Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Monash University, 3800, Victoria, Australia

    Michael A. Reid & Gerry P. Quinn

Authors
  1. Michael A. Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerry P. Quinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reid, M.A., Quinn, G.P. Hydrologic regime and macrophyte assemblages in temporary floodplain wetlands: Implications for detecting responses to environmental water allocations. Wetlands 24, 586–599 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0586:HRAMAI]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0586:HRAMAI]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation